<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fee Structures for Internet Marketing Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Excellence Since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: waqas</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>waqas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-420</guid>
		<description>i agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Audette</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>John Audette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-419</guid>
		<description>@Tom - You are so right about trust. Trust is the glue that holds together long-term relationships. Good relationships start with at least a modicum of trust - and they grow into great relationships when everyone is loyal to that trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom - You are so right about trust. Trust is the glue that holds together long-term relationships. Good relationships start with at least a modicum of trust - and they grow into great relationships when everyone is loyal to that trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-418</guid>
		<description>My approach is blended.

You could say:

Faith based billing backed by demonstrable ROI with the best metrics the project can implement.  Fees estimated as a percentage of ad buy and refined based on actual labor hours.

I work in the small business market. Without a certain amount of trust between me and the client the wheels soon come off anyway.

-T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My approach is blended.</p>
<p>You could say:</p>
<p>Faith based billing backed by demonstrable ROI with the best metrics the project can implement.  Fees estimated as a percentage of ad buy and refined based on actual labor hours.</p>
<p>I work in the small business market. Without a certain amount of trust between me and the client the wheels soon come off anyway.</p>
<p>-T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Audette</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>John Audette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-416</guid>
		<description>@Matt - Thanks for the input. I got the phrase "fast ROI" from a presentation that Sequoia Capital gave to a mandatory meeting of the CEO's of their portfolio companies last week. 

Extraordinary meeting in my view, considering that Sequoia is one of the smartest group of entrepreneurs on the planet. The meeting was confidential, but a lot of the information has been posted online - the &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/eldon/sequoia-capital-on-startups-and-the-economic-downturn-presentation?type=powerpoint" rel="nofollow"&gt;slideshow is here&lt;/a&gt;.

I don't like the phrase "fast ROI" as it smacks of fast money, but that's not their meaning. What they are telling their CEO's is that they should not spend money on anything that doesn't demonstrate a positive and quick  ROI.

&lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/08/sequoia-rings-the-alarm-bell-silicon-valley-in-trouble" rel="nofollow"&gt;Meeting notes here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt - Thanks for the input. I got the phrase &#8220;fast ROI&#8221; from a presentation that Sequoia Capital gave to a mandatory meeting of the CEO&#8217;s of their portfolio companies last week. </p>
<p>Extraordinary meeting in my view, considering that Sequoia is one of the smartest group of entrepreneurs on the planet. The meeting was confidential, but a lot of the information has been posted online - the <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/eldon/sequoia-capital-on-startups-and-the-economic-downturn-presentation?type=powerpoint" rel="nofollow">slideshow is here</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the phrase &#8220;fast ROI&#8221; as it smacks of fast money, but that&#8217;s not their meaning. What they are telling their CEO&#8217;s is that they should not spend money on anything that doesn&#8217;t demonstrate a positive and quick  ROI.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/08/sequoia-rings-the-alarm-bell-silicon-valley-in-trouble" rel="nofollow">Meeting notes here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt@Kurb</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt@Kurb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Cool post John. Plenty for me to think about and I'm glad I found this blog. Demonstrable fast ROI would be the golden goose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post John. Plenty for me to think about and I&#8217;m glad I found this blog. Demonstrable fast ROI would be the golden goose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Audette</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>John Audette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-414</guid>
		<description>@SEO Blog - That's not faith based, that's performance. A model that I am seriously considering. I'm thinking starting a venture marketing company modeled somewhat after venture capital companies. But instead of providing capital, it will provide interactive marketing services in exchange for a return based on performance. Fast ROI is going to be critically important for all businesses as we move forward in a more challenging economic environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SEO Blog - That&#8217;s not faith based, that&#8217;s performance. A model that I am seriously considering. I&#8217;m thinking starting a venture marketing company modeled somewhat after venture capital companies. But instead of providing capital, it will provide interactive marketing services in exchange for a return based on performance. Fast ROI is going to be critically important for all businesses as we move forward in a more challenging economic environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Faith based performance pay scales have really taken off for myself. I've found a great deal of success with my strategies and the billing format seems to provide clients with what they need and want! I keep it a general rule of thumb to make the client atleast a 150% ROI before asking for a single dime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith based performance pay scales have really taken off for myself. I&#8217;ve found a great deal of success with my strategies and the billing format seems to provide clients with what they need and want! I keep it a general rule of thumb to make the client atleast a 150% ROI before asking for a single dime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick @ Mackerel Media</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick @ Mackerel Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I should clarify - when I say simply "charge a fee", I mean that whilst you may set a time budget internally so that resources are allocated, you don't apply a time calculation to the fee charged to the client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify - when I say simply &#8220;charge a fee&#8221;, I mean that whilst you may set a time budget internally so that resources are allocated, you don&#8217;t apply a time calculation to the fee charged to the client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick @ Mackerel Media</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick @ Mackerel Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I'm with the hour-based billing route at the moment - it gives clients and us sufficient transparency in arrangements and although the upside may be limited, the alternative benefit is that the better job you do, the more demand there is and the more you can charge.

I remember a number of years ago that there were web development agencies springing up in London (I'm in Scotland) that worked on a profit or revenue-share basis with their clients. They invested heavily in e-commerce development on behalf of their clients and as it was pre-bubble, they expected to reap enormous rewards. No need to tell you what &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; happened!

Another way to approach billing is simply to charge a fee for your services, with no defined metric on it. If the client likes the amount you're charging, you can stand to make significant profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the hour-based billing route at the moment - it gives clients and us sufficient transparency in arrangements and although the upside may be limited, the alternative benefit is that the better job you do, the more demand there is and the more you can charge.</p>
<p>I remember a number of years ago that there were web development agencies springing up in London (I&#8217;m in Scotland) that worked on a profit or revenue-share basis with their clients. They invested heavily in e-commerce development on behalf of their clients and as it was pre-bubble, they expected to reap enormous rewards. No need to tell you what <i>actually</i> happened!</p>
<p>Another way to approach billing is simply to charge a fee for your services, with no defined metric on it. If the client likes the amount you&#8217;re charging, you can stand to make significant profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Toman</title>
		<link>http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/internet-marketing-fee-structures/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Toman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=233#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I bill by contract.  I determine the project, divide it into phases.  Each phase is associated with a cost.  The client MUST remit the phase payment prior to any work being done.  Once payment is received the phase is completed.  The client must then sign off on it, then, remit the next phase payment.
The contract permits both parties to know the cost of the project prior to it becoming a project.  If I under estimate, my bad.  Client can add on to the contract amount by contract amendment which is very typical.
The contract outlines the exact details of the project.
There may be a downside to this method, but it is working well for me up to this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bill by contract.  I determine the project, divide it into phases.  Each phase is associated with a cost.  The client MUST remit the phase payment prior to any work being done.  Once payment is received the phase is completed.  The client must then sign off on it, then, remit the next phase payment.<br />
The contract permits both parties to know the cost of the project prior to it becoming a project.  If I under estimate, my bad.  Client can add on to the contract amount by contract amendment which is very typical.<br />
The contract outlines the exact details of the project.<br />
There may be a downside to this method, but it is working well for me up to this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
