Comments on: Joachim’s Presentation at SMX East: A Treasure Trove for SEOs http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/9-seo-takeaways-smx-east/ Internet Marketing Excellence Since 1995 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:20:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Shubham http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/9-seo-takeaways-smx-east/#comment-10441 Shubham Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:59:55 +0000 http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=1765#comment-10441 thanks for the roundup...Well the myth about duplicate content is well explained..! thanks for the roundup…Well the myth about duplicate content is well explained..!

]]> By: Adam Audette http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/9-seo-takeaways-smx-east/#comment-7503 Adam Audette Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:32:59 +0000 http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=1765#comment-7503 I agree, Penny. rel=canonical isn't going away, even though it's ironic Google is the only engine really supporting it. While I do think it makes sense to use in some situations, I'm also leary of putting too much faith in (what is currently) a Google-specific hack. If you can, 301 and fix things at the foundation. But if you can't, go for the easy link canonical band-aid. I agree, Penny. rel=canonical isn’t going away, even though it’s ironic Google is the only engine really supporting it. While I do think it makes sense to use in some situations, I’m also leary of putting too much faith in (what is currently) a Google-specific hack. If you can, 301 and fix things at the foundation. But if you can’t, go for the easy link canonical band-aid.

]]> By: Penny Gamer http://www.audettemedia.com/blog/9-seo-takeaways-smx-east/#comment-7479 Penny Gamer Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:17:07 +0000 http://www.audettemedia.com/?p=1765#comment-7479 Nice recap. Very interesting speculation on the use of 302s for cleaning up site structure. We implemented rel canonical several months ago and it certainly hasn't hurt us (best rankings we've ever seen...although certainly cannot attach them directly to the update). I really think this is a pretty straight forward issue. Google is literally begging sites to implement rel canonical. Seems pretty simple to me. Nice recap. Very interesting speculation on the use of 302s for cleaning up site structure. We implemented rel canonical several months ago and it certainly hasn’t hurt us (best rankings we’ve ever seen…although certainly cannot attach them directly to the update).

I really think this is a pretty straight forward issue. Google is literally begging sites to implement rel canonical. Seems pretty simple to me.

]]>